Julia Aleshina ([info]photo_by_julia) wrote in [info]foto_decadent,
2009-03-24 15:37:00
  • Previous
  • Memorize
  • Share
  • Next

Wendy Bevan

photographer: Wendy Bevan
magazine: MUSE, winter 2008


























  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    switch

    Your IP address will be recorded 

     
    Help
  • 23 comments

[info]churchofmanlove

March 28 2009, 03:06:44 UTC 3 years ago

Love.

[info]himeichig0

March 28 2009, 03:30:27 UTC 3 years ago

omg I love these. Amazing. 8D

[info]laurafashion

March 28 2009, 06:48:24 UTC 3 years ago

very nice. makes me think of paolo roversi

[info]gothicimage

March 28 2009, 07:24:14 UTC 3 years ago

Unfortunately that's the trouble with them. Been done to death much better elsewhere! :-(

[info]tarantel

March 28 2009, 07:50:14 UTC 3 years ago

Yep. Shame.

[info]kasmslo

March 28 2009, 15:30:53 UTC 3 years ago

Yes, that's what I thought at first... of Roversi.

[info]magenta_smile

March 28 2009, 13:20:11 UTC 3 years ago

fabuloussss

[info]tell_her_lies

March 28 2009, 15:35:26 UTC 3 years ago

god i am so sick of the blurring effect in editorials. its done correctly maybe 5% of the time.

i can't see what they're wearing. i can't see the models. i can't see anything.

[info]katyaa2000

March 28 2009, 16:34:51 UTC 3 years ago

agree

[info]annanomalee

March 29 2009, 16:27:10 UTC 3 years ago

i love wendy bevan, and i think the blurring works for some of the photos. i know she's all about lo-fi cameras, which is awesome, but would it hurt too much to increase shutter speed? i mean, we'd still get the theme of the shoot, just without overkill...maybe.

[info]linka_lebedeva

March 28 2009, 15:54:48 UTC 3 years ago

looks like Sara Moon

[info]junoskillet

March 28 2009, 15:59:57 UTC 3 years ago

i love wendy bevan but she should go easier on the blur.

[info]q_0_t

March 28 2009, 17:12:25 UTC 3 years ago

roversism

[info]little_garcon

March 28 2009, 17:46:06 UTC 3 years ago

The styling and makeup are gorgeous. Now if only I could actually see them more clearly.

[info]5nap5hot

March 28 2009, 19:22:15 UTC 3 years ago

Unoriginal. Paulo Roversi should sue for visual plagerism

[info]mystikminx

March 29 2009, 02:23:28 UTC 3 years ago

wow. if the inability to focus my camera makes for wonderful images, then I'm a genius.

I'm sick of out-of-focus photography equating itself with amazingness and something unique and wonderful.

[info]obsceneholiday

March 30 2009, 04:11:47 UTC 3 years ago

some of them actually are in focus

[info]obsceneholiday

March 30 2009, 04:11:20 UTC 3 years ago

its so paulo riversi. omg i have a new favorite photographer

[info]decayings

March 30 2009, 09:46:08 UTC 3 years ago

Love some, hate some.
Straining to see what could have been amazing details in some.

[info]ghoulsoul

March 30 2009, 18:35:13 UTC 3 years ago

I love the blurryness, it has that haunting effect.

[info]fairy_glamour

March 31 2009, 02:55:09 UTC 3 years ago

Sick of the blurriness, personally...
I'd like to be able to see the pretty clothes, not strain my eyes to make out what the photos are.

[info]savior_of_none

April 6 2009, 05:02:14 UTC 3 years ago

Not good enough I only the ones where's the no blurred effect. I guess it takes a true artist to use the motion blurred effect.

[info]ourhorror

April 27 2009, 22:25:07 UTC 3 years ago

hate it.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…